Perhaps the most important lesson I have taken from exploring NLP in the context of relationships is the importance of your own inner state.
Many people experience the sequence in the opposite way. They think:
First, this relationship problem has to disappear. Then I can feel better again.
Their partner needs to understand at last. Make a decision. Apologise. Allow more closeness. Become more committed. Criticise less. Until that happens, their wellbeing seems to be on hold. For years, I felt exactly the same.
My experience now is that, in almost every situation, the more useful sequence is the reverse:
First, help yourself regain access to a resourceful inner state. From there, you can address the relationship problem with more clarity, kindness and effectiveness.
Your partner’s behaviour still matters. A change of state does not make boundaries, agreements or injuries irrelevant. What it can restore is something that easily disappears in tense moments: your own capacity to choose what you do next.
What I mean by a good inner state
A good state does not mean feeling happy all the time. Nor does it mean getting rid of anger, fear or sadness, suppressing them, overriding them or distracting yourself from them.
Feelings contain important information. Anger may point to a crossed boundary. Fear may show that security or orientation is missing. Sadness may express that something matters deeply to you. A good state allows you to receive that information without one feeling obscuring every other possibility.
In NLP, this is often called a resourceful state: an inner state in which helpful capacities become available again. These might include calm, courage, humour, empathy, self-respect, curiosity, clarity, connection, determination or self-efficacy.
You do not need all of those resources at once. A little more calm may be decisive before a difficult conversation. Setting a boundary might call for clarity and self-respect. Apologising may require courage and compassion.
The key question is:
Which inner state would enable me to respond in a way that fits me and my relationship – and supports me, my partner and the relationship itself?
Why problems are so hard to solve from a poor state
When you feel threatened, rejected or helpless, your view of the situation changes. Your attention looks for more signs of danger. Ambiguous sentences sound more like attacks. Memories of similar disappointments become easier to access. Immediate relief can begin to matter more than a solution that will still work in the long term.
Under stress, people also tend to lose some of their flexibility in imagining or trying different responses. Tunnel vision sets in, leaving only one apparent option. That is when sentences such as “I’ve told you a thousand times that …” appear. Even when it is rationally obvious that doing the same thing for the thousand-and-first time is unlikely to produce a different result, people repeat it and try to force their way through.
In “Why Anxiety Is Not the Enemy” and its accompanying German-language podcast episode, I explore how fight, flight and freeze patterns can undermine a resourceful state. You may respond with accusations, withdrawal or silence even though what you actually want is contact and clarity.
A resourceful inner state can widen your perspective. Psychologist Barbara Fredrickson’s broaden-and-build theory proposes that positive emotions can broaden our momentary repertoire of thoughts and actions. Research on positive affect also connects it with wider attention and greater cognitive flexibility. This does not mean that a good mood solves every problem. It does, however, help to explain why more than one possible response often becomes visible when we are in a more resourceful state.
Research with couples also highlights the role of regulation. In an experiment involving 253 people, acceptance and cognitive reappraisal reduced cardiac reactivity during couple conflict compared with a control condition. In a longitudinal study of married couples, faster downregulation of wives’ negative emotion was associated with both partners’ current marital satisfaction and with wives’ later satisfaction; constructive communication mediated part of that association. This gender-specific finding is not a general rule for couples. Together with other evidence, however, it supports the basic idea that our inner state influences what kind of communication becomes possible during conflict.
Exercise: State before solution in five steps
You can use this short exercise before a difficult conversation or whenever your thoughts revolve almost entirely around your partner’s behaviour.
1. Explore your current state with curiosity
Pause the search for a solution and ask yourself:
- What can I feel in my body right now?
- Which feeling is strongest?
- How much freedom of choice do I experience on a scale from 0 to 10?
Do not burden yourself with having to name the state precisely. A single word such as anger, frustration or disappointment rarely captures the complexity of your inner experience. Instead, observe your senses. Which images of the past, present or future appear in your mind? Which bodily sensations – pressure, tightness, temperature – do you notice? What does your inner dialogue sound like?
2. Move your body in a more helpful direction
Most unresourceful states are linked to a corresponding posture. It is difficult to feel entirely miserable while holding your body in a way that expresses joy and confidence. Place both feet on the floor, release your shoulders and jaw, and breathe steadily. Walk for a few minutes, stretch, or shake out your arms and hands. The aim is not to pretend to be happy; it is to offer your body a different direction.
You can find more body-based practices in “How to Build Inner Security: 6 Practical Exercises”.
3. Widen your attention to include three resources
The problem is allowed to remain in view. Add three resources alongside it:
- Something that is stable right now: a secure place, a person, a skill, your breath or a fact you can rely on.
- Something that helps you feel better: music, movement, nature, warmth, humour or a pleasant memory.
- Something you already know how to do: listen, state a boundary, take a pause, ask for help or postpone a decision.
This follows the same principle as “Energy Flows Where Attention Goes”: what you deliberately include in your focus becomes more available as a possibility.
4. Activate the state you want
Choose the resource you need most right now – perhaps calm, courage, self-respect or clarity. Remember a specific moment when you experienced it. What did you notice? How did you breathe? What was your posture like? Allow the memory to become vivid for a few breaths.
The important part is not to carry the resource as an empty label, but to activate it as a sensory experience. What exactly do you see, hear, feel, smell or taste when that resource is present? The more detail you can imagine, the more vividly the resource may become available.
5. Only now ask the smallest solvable question
Check your scale again. You do not need to reach 10; a noticeable shift is often enough. Rather than asking “How do I solve our entire relationship?”, choose a smaller question:
- What do I want to communicate to my partner specifically?
- Which request would make a next step possible?
- Which boundary can I express calmly and clearly?
If no helpful action comes to mind, agree to postpone the conversation and name a time when you will return to it.
A resourceful state is not compulsory positivity
The idea can easily be misunderstood: if I can influence my state, perhaps I am no longer allowed to be angry about my partner’s behaviour. That interpretation would simply create a new form of pressure.
You are allowed to feel hurt, angry or disappointed. Self-regulation does not mean tolerating every behaviour from another person. It means staying in contact with your feelings while recovering your options. Being resourceful does not mean that unpleasant feelings disappear. It means not becoming so flooded by them that you can no longer see an alternative to feeling helplessly at their mercy.
Sometimes a resourceful state leads to a conciliatory conversation. Sometimes it leads to a clear no. Sometimes you recognise that another explanation will not make the problem disappear and that you need to make a decision. And sometimes it helps you laugh about the situation because you realise that, at heart, you and your partner want the same thing.
The value of a resourceful state is therefore not that it preserves every relationship. It helps you act in a way that reflects your dignity, needs and values, rather than obeying whichever passing feeling is loudest.
Do not wait for conflict to practise
The more often you practise accessing resources during calm periods, the easier it becomes to find them when you need them. Small recurring practices can help:
- meditating in the morning or evening,
- writing down personal resources or keeping a gratitude journal,
- writing and revisiting a journal regularly,
- returning to an inner place of security,
- building routines around sport and movement,
- eating well and getting enough sleep.
Gradually, a different inner sequence begins to form:
I am allowed to care for my inner state first. From there, I can address the problem.
For me, this is one of the most valuable lessons in NLP. A good state does not automatically make relationships effortless. It does, however, help you become someone who can listen, think, feel, set boundaries, love and decide – depending on what the situation calls for – instead of being driven by the loudest feeling in the moment.
If you would like to begin or deepen a meditation practice, you can try my happiness meditation in the podcast (available in German only). I have also created a guided meditation on self-worth and self-acceptance (available in German only). The exact way you begin matters less than beginning. There is no such thing as a bad meditation.
The related article “When Your Happiness Depends on Your Partner’s Reaction” explores how to stop making access to calm, dignity and joy entirely dependent on another person’s next response.
When you cannot find that state on your own
Some relationship patterns are so well rehearsed that access to calm and choice keeps disappearing. A neutral setting can slow the dynamic down and create space to practise different responses.
In a complimentary, no-obligation introductory call, we can explore whether relationship coaching would provide a helpful setting. The first step is the same in individual and couples coaching: we create a state in which more becomes possible. I would be glad to support you, or both of you, with my experience.
Sources and further exploration
- Barbara L. Fredrickson: The Role of Positive Emotions in Positive Psychology: The Broaden-and-Build Theory of Positive Emotions, American Psychologist (2001).
- Katharina I. Salo et al.: At the heart of couple conflict: Emotion regulation and cardiac reactivity, International Journal of Psychophysiology (2025).
- Lian Bloch, Claudia M. Haase and Robert W. Levenson: Emotion regulation predicts marital satisfaction: More than a wives’ tale, Emotion (2014).
- Dr Daniel Köpke: Happiness Meditation, podcast episode 26 and Self-Acceptance Meditation – You Are Good and Right as You Are (both available in German only).